Tinman wrote:
kfeltenberger wrote:
And yet almost every country that adopted the F-104 used it an attack plane and thought it had enough maneuverability for the role.
If you will do a little reading on the subject, many of those countries that adopted the F-104 did so due to HEFTY pay-offs to politicians by the Lockheed Aircraft Corp. - not because the aircraft was the best for what they needed. All that didn't come out till just a few years ago. Many were looking harder at the Mirage III at the time.
In other words, Lockheed pulled a BAE.
Regardless of how, the fact remains that it was used. If it was so crappy, then why did the Italians continue to refine the airframe (when others were available) and then when others were available (F-16, F-1C) did they instead decide to continue with the F-104?
There will always be politics involved in any big ticket purchase, but I think the aircraft's operational history does paint it as successful given the longevity and the new versions/variants developed by user nations after Lockheed had ceased production.
_________________
Kurt
Click the link to read Lady Hecate off line in PDF, .epub, or Kindle formats:
http://www.bsg94.org/downloads/index.htmlClick here for the Colonial Warbook for Lady H:
http://www.photobucket.com/colonial_warbook